"We had conflicts over officer selection..."
"The same people always bear the burden"
"We want to gain member trust through transparent decision-making"
For NPOs and volunteer organizations, transparent governance leads to organizational trust.
This article explains how to fairly conduct officer selection, duty assignment, and role distribution from an organizational management perspective.
Challenges Faced by NPOs & Volunteer Organizations
Solve This in 5 Minutes
With Amida-san, start for free with no registration required
Try for Free
1. Officer Selection Challenges
Common Problems:
"No one volunteers to run"
"Same people serve as officers every year"
"Selection process is opaque"
"Decisions made by a few people's opinions"
Impact:
Member distrust
Decreased participation motivation
Failure to attract new members
Lower evaluation in grant reviews
2. Role Distribution Challenges
Common Problems:
"Burden concentrated on specific individuals"
"Unwanted roles being pushed around"
"Deteriorating relationships due to unfairness"
"Volunteer work feels like obligation"
Impact:
Burnout syndrome
Member attrition
Declining activity quality
Concerns about organizational sustainability
3. Transparency & Governance Challenges
Common Problems:
"Decision-making process is invisible"
"Decisions made only by a few members"
"No records kept"
"Insufficient accountability"
Impact:
Declining trust from donors and grant organizations
Difficulties in government partnerships
Loss of media credibility
Declining social reputation
Importance of Transparent Organization Management
Stakeholder Trust
Donors:
"Are donations being used appropriately?"
"Is the organization managed soundly?"
"Is there transparency?"
Grant Foundations:
Governance structure verification
Decision-making process transparency
Accounting appropriateness
Government:
NPO certification requirements
Subsidy and contract project review criteria
Public benefit assessment
Beneficiaries:
Trust in service continuity
Organizational stability
Internal Member Satisfaction
What Transparency Brings:
Acceptance of decision-making
Sense of belonging to organization
Increased willingness to contribute
Long-term commitment
Improving Transparency in Officer Selection
1. Board Member & Auditor Selection
Recommended Process
Step 1: Clarify Officer Requirements
Items to document:
Term of office (e.g., 2 years, renewable)
Job duties
Expected time commitment
Required skills and experience
Compensation (if any)
Step 2: Call for Candidates & Nominations
Transparency points:
Specify application period (minimum 2 weeks)
Notify all members
Document nomination reasons
Confirm nominee's consent
Step 3: Candidate Information Disclosure
Information to disclose:
Background and expertise
Track record of contributions to organization
Aspirations as an officer
Conflicts of interest
Step 4: Choose Selection Method
Method A: Election
Voting at general meeting
Ensure fairness with anonymous voting
Transparent vote counting (confirmed by multiple people)
Method B: Nomination Committee
Establish selection committee
Select committee members considering diversity
Document nomination reasons
Approval at general meeting
Method C: Lottery When Multiple Equally Qualified Candidates
Multiple candidates with similar qualifications
Decide through fair lottery
Process visible to all participants
Step 5: Record Keeping
Records to maintain:
Minutes of selection process
Voting results (with privacy considerations)
Nomination reasons
Q&A at general meeting
2. Committee Member Selection
Types:
Public Relations Committee
Project Committee
Accounting Audit Committee
Event Executive Committee
Transparent Selection Methods:
Preference Survey
Ask all members for preferences
Fill in up to 3rd choice
Coordination
Adjust committees with concentrated preferences
Decide fairly through online amidakuji
Skill Matching
Separately consider committees requiring expertise
But ensure transparency
Fair Duty & Role Distribution
1. Regular Duties (Reception, Cleaning, etc.)
Challenges:
Same people always burdened
Unclear substitute when absent
Sense of unfairness
Solution: Create Rotation Schedule
Step 1: Survey Everyone's Availability
Using Google Forms, etc.:
- Available days and times
- Unavailable dates
- Preferred frequency (once/month, twice/month, etc.)
Step 2: Create Fair Rotation Schedule
1. Determine initial order with amidakuji
2. Then rotate in sequence
3. If absent, priority for next time
Step 3: Visualization
- Share via Google Calendar
- Post on paper as well
- Automate reminder notifications
2. Event Role Distribution
Example: Charity Event
Roles:
General Manager
Reception Staff
Venue Setup
PR Staff
Accounting Staff
Photography/Records
Transparent Distribution Methods:
Method 1: Skill-based + Lottery
1. Roles requiring expertise (accounting, etc.) go to qualified people
2. Other roles - preference survey
3. Overlapping preferences decided by lottery
Method 2: Burden Point System
Assign burden points to each role:
- General Manager: 10 points
- Reception: 3 points
- Setup: 5 points
Adjust so each person's annual points are equal
3. Long-term Project Team Formation
Example: New Business Launch
Transparency Process:
Share Project Overview
Purpose, duration, required commitment
Open Call
Recruit interested parties
Submit application reasons
Selection
Clarify selection criteria in advance
Review by selection committee
Feedback on results and reasons
Team Roles
Roles within team decided fairly through amidakuji , etc.
Transparent Decision-Making Process
Try Amida-san Free Now
100% Free
All basic features free
No Registration
No email required
Quick Setup
Just share a URL
Mobile Ready
Join from anywhere
Start Free Now
1. General Meeting & Board Operations
Transparency Points:
Preparation:
Advance disclosure of agenda (2 weeks prior)
Advance distribution of materials
Accept questions in advance
On the Day:
Create minutes (record speaker names)
Clarify resolutions
Record dissenting opinions
Follow-up:
Publish minutes (within 1 week)
Announce decisions
Report implementation status
2. Daily Decision-Making
Even for Small Decisions:
Record decision process
Report to stakeholders
Collect feedback
Tool Utilization:
Discussion on Slack/ChatWork, etc.
Collaborative editing on Google Docs
Use voting features
Governance Strengthening Checklist
Organizational Structure
Transparency
Fairness
Accountability
Specific Tool Utilization
1. Online Amidakuji
Usage Scenarios:
Officer mutual selection (select 1 from equally qualified candidates)
Committee member determination
Event role distribution
Duty order determination
Benefits:
2. Google Workspace (Nonprofit Edition)
Free Features:
Gmail (custom domain)
Google Calendar (duty schedule sharing)
Google Drive (document sharing)
Google Forms (surveys/voting)
Application Method:
Apply to Google for Nonprofits
(For public interest corporations and NPO corporations)
3. Slack / ChatWork
Use Cases:
Daily communication
Record decision-making
Simple decisions through voting features
File sharing
4. Trello / Notion
Project Management:
Task visualization
Clarify assignees
Share progress
Who's doing what at a glance
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: What if no one wants to be an officer?
A: Consider these measures:
Subdivide roles : Reduce burden
Shorten terms : Lower psychological barrier with 1-year terms
Multiple-person system : Co-representative system
Consider compensation : Appropriate honorarium
Utilize external talent : Invite external experts as board members
Q2: Is it appropriate to decide officers by lottery?
A: It depends on the case:
Appropriate : Mutual selection when multiple equally qualified candidates exist
Inappropriate : Positions requiring expertise or experience
Choosing fair decision methods is important.
Q3: Should board minutes be fully disclosed?
A: Basically disclose to members, publish summaries publicly:
For members : Detailed minutes
For public : Summary version (excluding personal information)
Non-disclosure : Personnel matters, personal privacy
Q4: How can remote members participate in decisions?
A: Utilize online tools:
Hold general meetings via Zoom
Online lottery
Electronic voting
Written resolution
However, the articles must specify "online participation allowed."
Q5: Do small organizations need governance too?
A: Yes, it's important regardless of size:
Prevent relationship troubles precisely because it's small
Prepare for future growth
Gain social credibility
Advantageous for grant applications
Start with a simplified version and gradually build it up.
Summary
Improving transparency in NPOs and volunteer organizations:
Importance:
Gain stakeholder trust
Improve internal member satisfaction
Organizational sustainability
Implementation Methods:
Recommended Tools:
Online amidakuji (role determination)
Google Workspace (document management)
Slack/ChatWork (communication)
Keys to Success:
Process visualization
Opportunities for full participation
Regular reviews
Reflect feedback
Build a trusted organization through transparent governance!
Try Amida-san Now! Experience fair and transparent drawing with our simple and easy-to-use online ladder lottery tool.
Try it Now