Fair Decision-Making Methods for Schools and Educational Settings [Complete Guide to Role Assignment, Group Division, and Order Determination]
Published:
Updated:
Author: Amida-san Team
Fair Decision-Making Methods for Schools and Educational Settings
"Who will be the class president?" "How should we divide groups?" "What's the presentation order?"
In schools and educational settings, there are countless situations where decisions need to be made "fairly." When decision-making processes lack transparency, it can lead to student dissatisfaction and negatively impact classroom management.
This article provides a detailed, scenario-based explanation of fair decision-making methods for educational settings.
First and last positions have advantages/disadvantages
Fairness of preparation time
Differences in nervousness levels
Recommended Methods:
Method 1: Completely Random
Determine order with amidakuji
Transparency everyone can accept
Decide in advance to secure preparation time
Method 2: Choice + Lottery
Have students choose "first half" or "second half"
Lottery within each group
Reflect some preferences
Method 3: Reverse Rotation
Those in second half last time get first half priority this time
Record history to maintain fairness
Lab/Practice Order
Challenges:
Long wait times reduce concentration
Limited equipment/facilities
Differences in observation quality
Recommended Method:
Create Rotation Table:
Determine all group order with amidakuji
Display in easy-to-read table
Manage time with timer
Rotate in reverse order next time
Lunch/Cleaning Duty Order
Challenges:
Efficiency important for daily tasks
Handling absent students
Maintaining sense of fairness
Recommended Method:
Weekly Rotation:
Decide all week assignments at semester start
Confirm everyone's order with amidakuji
Display and visualize
Clarify substitute rules for absences
Teacher Guide: Implementation Steps
Step 1: Explaining to Students
Explanation for Lower Grades:
"Today, we're going to decide roles together.
This amidakuji is like magic lottery that nobody knows the result of.
Everyone takes turns drawing lines and we make it together.
That's why it's so fair!"
Explanation for Upper Grades:
"Today's role assignment uses digital amidakuji.
Everyone can participate from smartphones or tablets.
Each person draws a line one by one, so nobody can manipulate the result.
It's a mathematically proven fair method."
Step 2: Preparing the Environment
Necessary Environment:
Wi-Fi connection (if students participate from smartphones)
1. Explanation (3 minutes)
2. Everyone participates (5-10 minutes)
- Draw lines in attendance number order
- Say "Done!" after drawing
3. Result announcement (2 minutes)
4. Recording (1 minute)
Step 4: Follow-up
Record results in class journal
Individual support for dissatisfied students
Note improvements for next time
Create explanation materials for parents (as needed)
Explaining to Parents
Example Class Newsletter Explanation
【About Role Assignment】
This semester's role assignment used digital amidakuji.
This tool has the following features:
✓ High transparency with full participation
✓ System where nobody can manipulate results
✓ Mathematically guaranteed fairness
✓ Opportunity for children to learn democratic decision-making
Even when students are dissatisfied with results, we guide them
to gain acceptance by understanding the fairness of the process.
Explanation at Parent-Teacher Conferences
Key Points:
Emphasize educational significance
Explain basis of fairness
Position as growth opportunity for children
Prioritize process over results
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: Are digital tools educationally appropriate?
No problem. In fact, they provide these educational benefits:
Improved digital literacy
Democratic education through visualized fairness
Opportunity to learn appropriate use of technology
Q2: What about students without smartphones?
Can participate from tablets or PCs
Use classroom devices
Let them participate with friends
Teachers can operate on their behalf
Q3: How to handle dissatisfied students?
Carefully explain the fairness of the process
Give priority for next time
Share the positive aspects of assigned role
Don't forget individual follow-up
Q4: What if someone is absent?
Decide substitute rules in advance
Re-draw with remaining members
Next absent person substitutes
Maintain fairness while being flexible
Q5: Won't using the same method get boring?
If it gets boring:
Change methods each semester
Combine discussion and lottery
Let students choose the decision method itself
Change methods according to growth
Summary
Fair decision-making in schools and educational settings:
Role Assignment: Preference survey + transparent lottery
Group Division: Choose method according to purpose
Order Determination: Combination of randomness and recording