How to Decide Presentation Order [Fair & Acceptable Methods]

"How should we decide presentation order?" "Is going first disadvantageous? Or advantageous?" "Don't want conflicts over order... what's fair?"

The "presentation order problem" inevitably arises when multiple people present in meetings, competitions, academic conferences, etc.

In fact, research shows presentation order significantly impacts results.

This article explains the psychological effects of presentation order and fair, acceptable methods for deciding order.

Impact of Presentation Order on Results

Primacy Effect

First information heard tends to remain in memory.

Benefits:

• Audience concentration high
• No comparison objects, appears fresh
• Tends to leave impression

Drawbacks:

• Evaluation criteria not established
• Easy comparison with later presentations
• Large pressure

Recency Effect

Last information heard tends to remain in memory.

Benefits:

• Recent memory affects evaluation
• Can reference other presentations
• Easy time adjustment

Drawbacks:

• Audience fatigue, decreased concentration
• "Want to finish soon" atmosphere
• Buried by comparison with previous presentations

Middle Position Disadvantage (Serial Position Effect)

Middle positions are least memorable.

Research Results:

• First and last advantageous (about 40% memory retention)
• Middle disadvantageous (about 20% memory retention)
• Difference more pronounced with more presenters

6 Methods to Decide Presentation Order

Method 1: Completely Random (Fairest)

Overview: Decide by lottery or random selection

Benefits:

• Fairness where no one can complain
• Unpredictable and interesting
• Easy preparation

Drawbacks:

• Large luck element
• Can't make strategic adjustments

Implementation: Use a transparent fair lottery tool so everyone can confirm the process, eliminating suspicions of fraud. Deciding order in advance also helps presenters prepare.

Recommended Scenes:

• Company presentation contests
• Academic conferences
• Competition preliminaries

Method 2: Self-Declaration (By Preference)

Overview: Decide from volunteers

Benefits:

• Acceptance from self-choice
• Match preparation convenience
• Few troubles

Drawbacks:

• Bias toward popular positions
• Adjustment needed if undecided
• Passive people disadvantaged

Implementation:

1. Collect preference rankings via advance survey
2. Decide fairly only among duplicates
3. Decide among remaining for unpopular positions

Recommended Scenes:

• Small study sessions (5-10 people)
• Close members
• When preferences expected to distribute

Method 3: Experience/Achievement Order

Overview: Inexperienced people first

Benefits:

• Consideration for beginners
• Experienced can follow up
• Educational effect

Drawbacks:

• Veterans always last
• "Beginner = poor" impression
• Some feel unfair

Implementation:

1. Confirm presentation experience
2. Order: Beginners → Intermediate → Veterans
3. Decide within same levels by other methods

Recommended Scenes:

• New employee training presentations
• Student group presentations
• Educational/OJT purposes

Method 4: Decide by Theme/Content Flow

Overview: Story-focused order

Benefits:

• Improved audience understanding
• Overall unity
• High program quality

Drawbacks:

• Time-consuming adjustment
• May conflict with presenter preferences
• Large organizer burden

Implementation:

1. Understand presentation content in advance
2. Design logical flow
3. Propose order to presenters and adjust

Recommended Scenes:

• Academic conference sessions
• Conferences
• Events where story important

Method 5: Alphabetical/Kana Order

Overview: Decide mechanically by name

Benefits:

• Completely mechanical and fair
• No room for argument
• Easy preparation

Drawbacks:

• Name-based luck
• Same people always same order
• Boring

Implementation:

1. Arrange roster alphabetically
2. Assign directly to presentation order

Recommended Scenes:

• Regular reports (combine with rotation system)
• Large numbers making adjustment difficult
• Time-constrained

Method 6: Hybrid Method (Combination)

Overview: Combine multiple methods

Examples:

• First decide first/second half, then random within
• Decide broad framework by experience, random within same level
• Group by theme, random within groups

Benefits:

• High flexibility
• Consider multiple elements
• Balanced

Drawbacks:

• Complex explanation
• Unclear rules
• Time-consuming adjustment

Recommended Scenes:

• Large conferences
• Diverse presenters
• Emphasize both fairness and flow

Scenario-Based: Recommended Decision Methods

Company Presentation Contests

Purpose: Fairness and excitement

Recommended: Completely random method

Reasons:

• Fairness everyone accepts
• Lottery event itself exciting
• Reduced first presenter pressure (because luck)

Sales Competition/Proposal Presentations

Purpose: Maximize performance

Recommended: Self-declaration + random

Reasons:

• Match preparation status
• Strategic choice possible
• Random only on overlap ensures fairness

Academic Conferences/Events

Purpose: Content flow and understandability

Recommended: Theme order + random within themes

Reasons:

• Improved audience understanding
• Better overall session quality
• Fairness within same field

Training/Education Programs

Purpose: Maximize learning effect

Recommended: Experience order (beginners → veterans)

Reasons:

• Reduce beginner psychological burden
• Show veteran examples
• Improved feedback quality

Regular Reports

Purpose: Prevent staleness and fairness

Recommended: Change method each time

Examples:

• Round 1: Alphabetical
• Round 2: Reverse
• Round 3: Random
• Round 4: Previous reverse

Tips to Reduce Presentation Order Disadvantages

Reduce First Presenter Pressure

Tip 1: Insert Icebreaker

• Light Q&A before presentation
• Warm up venue atmosphere
• Create "failure OK" atmosphere

Tip 2: Clearly Present Evaluation Criteria

• Absolute evaluation, not relative
• Share scoring sheet in advance
• Include order-based adjustment

Prevent Middle Position Burial

Tip 1: Insert Breaks

• 5-minute break every 2-3 people
• Reset effect restores memory freshness
• Maintain concentration

Tip 2: Q&A After Each Presentation

• Fix impressions
• Boost audience participation
• Creates rhythm

Last Position Fatigue Countermeasures

Tip 1: Shorten Overall Time

• Limit per-person presentation time
• Recommend concise presentations
• Strict timekeeper

Tip 2: Create Special Final Slot

• "Best Presentation Award" announcement
• Overall summary time
• Maintain concentration to end

Summary: Fairness and Acceptance Most Important

In presentation order, fairness and transparency are most important.

What You Can Practice Today:

1. Pre-disclose presentation order decision method
2. Decide with process everyone accepts
3. Incorporate order disadvantage reduction measures

Especially in situations with stakes or evaluation, using a fair and transparent lottery tool prevents complaints and troubles.

Please try in your next presentation event.

---

Related Articles:

• Fair Role Assignment Methods
• Remote Meeting Speaking Order Decision
• Mathematical Proof of Fairness
• Event Planning Success Strategies